API-First vs Design-First: Approaches to API Development

Build anything with world’s most popular website builder
Learn Web Development Online
Find Your trusted Web App Development Company

What approach should one take for API development: API-first or Design-first? Can a different approach influence the final product and its efficiency? How can developers navigate through the potential discrepancies that may arise from using the wrong approach?

It has been observed that the effectiveness and subsequent impact of the software system largely depend on the initial approach taken towards API development (Cirani, S., Ferrari, L., 2020). This dichotomy between API-first and Design-first procedures impacts various aspects such as functionality, resource allocation, and the overall value of the product. Research from Parsons (David Parson, 2017) indicates that picking the wrong approach may lead to unnecessary wastes of time and resources which could otherwise be spent improving the software system’s functionality. To tackle this issue, we propose a detailed analysis and comparison of both the API-first and Design-first methodologies.

In this article, you will learn about the nuances and underlying methodologies of API-first and Design-first approaches. We will dissect their operations, understand their pros and cons, and inspect real-life implications of these technologies. Furthermore, we will present case studies that robustly support the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Ultimately, the goal of this article is not just to shed light on this dichotomy but also to equip developers with the knowledge and understanding required to select the most suitable approach for their API development tasks.

API-First vs Design-First: Approaches to API Development

Definitions and insights into API-First and Design-First Approaches

API-First is a development approach where the first item to be created in a product’s lifecycle is the Application Programming Interface (API). It involves designing and building an API for a product before the UI (User Interface). This allows developers to build software that easily interacts with other platforms.

On the other hand, Design-First approach involves designing the API’s contract first before writing any code. The intended user experience guides the whole development process. This approach ensures that the product meets user needs and provides a seamless experience.

Breaking Down Stereotypes: API-First is not the Only Route to Robust API Development

Understanding the API-First Development Approach

API-first development can be seen as a shift in programming paradigm, prioritizing the API over the application itself. In this strategy, developers design the API, which describes the way different software components should interact, before writing any code for the software itself. Basically, the API becomes the basis of the application. The premise stands on the idea that the best-designed APIs should cater to future-proofing, enabling applications to easily pivot toward new business requirements and trends.

With API-first, developers do not concern themselves with creating one specific user interface; rather, they create a series of reusable, shareable interfaces that can be leveraged by any type of application. The benefit is in the development speed: teams can work in parallel, on the front-end and back-end, after the API’s specification. However, this method needs a concrete vision of the application and its future, which is not always available.

Unveiling the Design-First Development Strategy

Contrary to API-First strategy, the design-first API approach centers around the user experience. In this scenario, developers start with the user interface of the application. They ponder on questions like – how the users will interact, what steps they will take to perform specific tasks, and how to make the workflow smoother for maximum efficiency?

Design-first aims to answer these questions to achieve an intuitive user experience. Key in this approach is the use of

  • Mockup tools
  • Prototyping
  • User experience (UX) design processes.

These help to visualize the end product, furnish productive discussions, and achieve user-friendly designs.

Design-first is centered around understanding the user and molding the application accordingly. It’s a top-down approach where you start big – with the user experience, breaking it down into manageable pieces – the user interface, and finally diving deep into the minute details of the API. Hence, contrary to API-first, a big picture approach is taken, and then refined to the smallest details. However, this approach can be time-consuming because it requires more initial planning and research about the users.

Choosing between the API-First and the design-first approach to API development isn’t about choosing the better method. It’s about understanding the needs of your project and your team, and matching that to the most suitable development strategy. Each approach comes with its own set of benefits and challenges. By understanding these, businesses can make a more educated choice between the two, breaking down stereotypes that API-First is the only route to robust API development.

Shifting Digital Landscapes: Design-First Approach as a Progressive Pathway in API Development

Are We Still Unraveling the API Development Conundrum?

When embarking on the path towards application programming interface (API) implementation, have we ever pondered which methodology holds the crown? A profound shift in thinking is required. API-First and Design-First are two different philosophies grappling for dominance in the realm of API development. Evidently, both have their merits. Yet, one steadily emerging narrative is the effectiveness of a Design-First approach in shaping the API development journey. It is an approach that emphasizes designing the API’s contract before writing any code.

A Paradigm Plagued with Pitfalls

While an API-First approach focuses on creating APIs that expose functionality, it falls short in several areas. This approach is akin to building a ship without a blueprint – a move that ignores how the users will interact with the outputs. Therein lies the issue – such an impromptu approach often leads to suboptimal experiences. Developers often complain about conceptual problems, lack of user feedback, absence of iterative design and costly code rewrites that stem from an API-First approach. The primary issue is that it follows a code-first, design-later philosophy, leading to a fragmented and unsatisfactory user experience.

Mastering the Artisty of the Design-First Approach

Renowned organizations such as Uber, eBay or Paypal provide excellent examples of the benefits reaped from the Design-First approach. By defining user interactions before any code is written, developers can deliver interactive and consumer-friendly experiences. For instance, Uber’s customer-centric focus led them to design their API integration to mirror the user interface. This ensured that the different components interacted seamlessly, providing a smooth and welcoming user experience. In the case of PayPal, they were able to elevate their user experience by allowing user feedback to shape their API design. These cases exemplify that superior user experience, cost efficiency and smoother API integration can be achieved by adopting a Design-First approach in API development journey. The sage insight would be to design before you dive.

Braving the Storm: Thriving Amidst the API-First vs Design-First Debate in API Development

The Ideological Divide

Is there really a one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to the development of an API? The answer, of course, is not quite as straightforward. On one hand, API-first strategy sees the API as the first order of architectural design, with the assumption that proper functioning API translates to a successful product. Conversely, the Design-first approach prioritizes a thorough UX/UI design before development, viewing the API more as a means to an end.

The ideological rift between the two strategies speaks volumes about the intrinsic challenges. The first approach can often lead to incoherent user experience since considerations of the API consumers might be overlooked, causing reduced product adoption rates. On the other side, a meticulously crafted UI might gloss over fundamental API design, potentially resulting in costly, time-consuming corrections in the subsequent development stages.

Performing the Delicate Balancing Act

The first approach can often lead to an incoherent user experience as the APIs are designed with technical specifications in mind, often overlooking the practical user scenarios. Consequently, this could result in reduced product adoption rates due to a complex and unfriendly user interface.

The design-first approach which focuses more on a coherent UX, can sometimes overlook the fundamental functionalities that a well-performing API should possess. This approach risks investing more time and resources in creating a visually appealing product that tends to fall short in functionalities. It can potentially land the development team back to the drawing board, causing costly and time-consuming corrections in the subsequent development stages.

Establishing a Middle Ground

Enter a hybrid approach. Successful businesses, drawing insights from their own development cycles, have found ways to bridge the gap between these two approaches by combining their pros while cancelling out the cons. Twitter, for instance, attributes its growth to an evolving strategy that places equal importance on concurrent API and design development. This also ensures continuous developer feedback, enabling swift issue resolution. Shopify, another success story, uses a design-first approach during the prototype stage and switches to API-first as the product develops, maintaining a continuous feedback loop between developers and users.

This integrated approach sounds promising, but its implementation is no easy feat. It requires a synergized team, streamlined processes, and a robust feedback mechanism. Yet, when properly carried out, it can be the saving grace, elevating your API development cycles to reach that delicate equilibrium between functionality and user experience.


To conclude, we should ponder on a crucial question: which of the two methods we discussed – API-first or Design-first – would indeed accelerate the digital transformation process of your enterprise? It is not a question of which one is better, but rather, which approach would be a good fit for the specific needs and demands of your organization. These strategies serve different purposes and selecting the right one could fundamentally hinge on the nature of your project or your organisational structure. Hence, taking the time to evaluate the pros and cons of each approach against your project requirements should be a vital aspect of your decision-making process.

Further, we would like to invite you to continuously engage with our blog and become a part of our community. This will give you unhindered access to extensive resources including insights, updates, and expert advice on a wide range of compelling topics. You can count on us to bring you trending tech-related content, thoughtful discussions, and innovative strategies that can help you keep up-to-date and navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Lastly, we would like to extend our gratitude to our faithful readers who have journeyed with us so far. To those of you who have only recently discovered us, we are delighted to have you on board. We promise to continue delivering quality content that matches your interests and enhances your knowledge. Let’s continue this journey of learning and growing together; see you in our future posts!


1. What is the API-First approach in API Development?
API-First approach involves defining the API’s contract first before building the software around it. The aim is to ensure that all the applications utilizing the API have a consistent experience, and it’s useful in microservices and serverless architectures.

2. How does the Design-First approach differ from API-First?
Design-First focuses on designing the API visually before any coding begins, ensuring all stakeholders understand and agree on the endpoints, methods, and responses. While this differs from API-First’s focus on contract definition, both emphasize planning before development.

3. Which amongst API-First and Design-First is a better approach?
The “better” approach will largely depend on the specific needs and circumstances of your project. They both prioritize planning but in different areas, API-First in contract, Design-First on visual comprehension. Your choice should align with your team’s skills and the project’s requirements.

4. How important is collaboration in these API development approaches?
Both methods highly value collaboration. In API-First, various teams need to agree on a common contract before development, while in Design-First, stakeholders must understand and agree on the visual design before proceeding.

5. Are there any major challenges when using these approaches?
Yes, both methods come with challenges. API-First can suffer from a lack of flexibility as changes require a rewriting of the entire contract, whilst Design-First may lead to prolonged development times if the visual design isn’t quickly agreed upon.