How to Implement Real-Time Features: WebSockets vs AJAX

Build anything with world’s most popular website builder
Learn Web Development Online
Find Your trusted Web App Development Company

Can we implement real-time features on our websites without compromising speed and user experience? How can WebSockets enhance the capacity of real-time communication between the client and server? What are the potential challenges or shortcomings of using AJAX for these real-time features? These are some of the overarching questions we will be scrutinizing in this exploration into the world of real-time web development.

One of the pressing issues of today’s web development era is the real-time implementation of certain features. According to Marek Todd in, AJAX’s latency issues can potentially hamper the user experience, especially when dealing with real-time applications. The WebSocket protocol provides a solution by establishing a two-way communication channel that greatly reduces latency, as noted by A. Russell in the Python Documentation blog. Therefore, understanding the contrast between both technologies and recognizing their potential in solving this problem is of significant importance.

In this article, you will learn about the unique characteristics of both AJAX and WebSockets and how these specific traits can affect the implementation of real-time features on a website. We will delve into the nuts and bolts of each technology, analyze their compatibility with various web platforms, and assess their implications on system performance and user experience.

Moreover, we will guide you through the practical applications of both WebSockets and AJAX in real-time web development, providing you with critical insights from industry experts. You will also discover various use cases where either technology emerges as the better choice, equipping you with the knowledge to pick the right tool for your development needs.

How to Implement Real-Time Features: WebSockets vs AJAX

Definitions for Understanding Real-Time Features: WebSockets vs AJAX

WebSockets is a technology that allows open, two-way communication between servers and clients. This enables, for instance, a webpage to look for updates in real-time without needing to reload. Quite akin to a phone call where both parties can speak and listen simultaneously. On the other hand, AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML) is a set of web development practices that help in creating interactive web applications. It’s like sending a letter and waiting for the response. The user can do other things while waiting but must request information from the server. In real-time features, this can mean lag or delay. These technologies provide the background structure for all the real-time interaction you see on the web today.

Unearthing the magic: Implementing Real-Time Features with WebSockets or AJAX?

The Essence of Real-Time Features: AJAX and WebSockets

In the world of web application development, real-time features bring the dynamism and interactivity that modern users demand. AJAX and WebSockets are two key technologies enabling this real-time functionality. AJAX, an acronym for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, is a set of web technologies used to send and retrieve data from a server asynchronously. Its biggest advantage is allowing web applications to update content without necessarily needing to reload the entire browser page.

WebSockets, on the other hand, is a communications protocol providing full-duplex communication between a client and a server over a long-lived, TCP-based connection. Furthermore, this protocol enables server-side push notifications, this means the server can send data to the client without the client’s request for the info, a prominent feature for real-time applications.

Comparative Study: AJAX vs WebSockets

When comparing the two for implementing real-time features, one has to consider their distinct advantages and disadvantages. AJAX brings with it the simplicity and ubiquity of HTTP, the ability to only transfer necessary data, and it easily navigates firewalls and proxies. Its main drawbacks are that it’s unidirectional – requiring polling or long-polling to fake a real-time connection – and that it can be resource-intensive.

  • AJAX is easier to implement and troubleshoot, thanks to its widespread use and community support.
  • AJAX communicates using HTTP protocol, which is stateless and can’t maintain a persistent connection between client and server.
  • Conversely, AJAX’s polling mechanisms to create a pseudo real-time connection can lead to excess network traffic and latency.

WebSockets, however, address AJAX’s limitations with real-time features. They provide two-way, real-time communication without any need to refresh the page or ‘fake’ a persistent connection. This makes the protocol efficient for real-time applications where quick data changes are paramount. The limitations of WebSockets mainly revolve around browser compatibility and the difficulties web developers might face if they’re not familiar with low-level networking.

Level of usage, latency, and speed are all defining factors when choosing between AJAX and WebSockets for implementing real-time features. The former could be a better fit for applications that don’t require constant, real-time updates, whereas the latter would be suited to applications where constant real-time communication is a necessity. Both AJAX and WebSockets are powerful tools in the developer’s arsenal, but understanding their unique strengths and weaknesses is key to using them effectively on the battlefield of speed.

In the Ring: Throwdown between WebSockets vs AJAX in Real-Time Features Implementation

A Question To Ponder: Are WebSockets the Next Evolutionary Step in Real-Time Technology?

The advent of WebSockets has brought us to a crossroads. Are they a mere link in the chain of evolutionary protocol development, or do they represent a revolutionary leap forward, superseding their AJAX predecessor? The key idea is that WebSockets are designed for high-performance, real-time interactions. Unlike AJAX, which necessitates the client to initiate communication and relies on HTTP to send requests to the server, WebSockets allow for full-duplex communication. This means that the server and the client can `speak’ to each other simultaneously, pushing data to each other as needed. This departure from AJAX’s uni-directional communication opens a new realm of advantages, including lower latencies, real-time updates, and less server processing.

Challenges with AJAX That WebSockets Hope to Overcome

While the introduction of AJAX was undoubtedly transformative, some lingering issues persist. The primary issue revolves around the inherent limitations built within HTTP, the protocol on which AJAX communication is based. Each AJAX request requires a new HTTP request-response cycle, which increases overhead and can impact performance. Furthermore, AJAX cannot handle real-time updates effectively or efficiently. For example, for live chat applications, AJAX needs to continuously poll the server to identify new messages, causing performance issues and high latency, thus failing to provide a truly interactive experience. Therefore, for applications necessitating real-time interaction, AJAX falls short.

Innovations Brought by WebSockets: Changing the Course of Real-Time Experience

WebSockets resolve these main problems by allowing two-way, real-time communication between the client and server without the need for multiple HTTP requests. A prime illustration of this advantage can be seen in the world of online multiplayer games. These platforms require an increased amount of interactivity and lower latencies for a smooth user experience. By using WebSockets, game developers have been able to ensure real-time updates without the need for continuous polling or long-polling practices common with AJAX. Another example, Slack, a widely known collaboration hub, used WebSockets to provide a seamless, real-time communication experience for users. Owing to the WebSocket protocol, applications can now push updates and offer high speed interactive experiences, thereby dramatically increasing user engagement levels. It’s clear to see that WebSockets have indeed disrupted the landscape of real-time features, propelling it beyond the confines set by AJAX.

Decoding the paradox: When and How to Choose Between WebSockets and AJAX for Real-Time Features?

Have You Ever Considered the Impact of AJAX and WebSockets on Real-Time Features?

AJAX, or Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, was once the go-to method for adding real-time features to a website. AJAX works by sending HTTP requests to the server to retrieve data without the need to reload the entire webpage, thus enhancing user experience by offering seamless interaction. However, while AJAX revolutionized the way websites interacted with their servers, it wasn’t designed for real-time communication. It is unidirectional, meaning it only allows communication from client to server, requiring constant polling to update information.

The Issue with AJAX and the Rise of WebSockets

The fundamental issue with AJAX is that it can be unnecessarily resource-intensive due to constant polling, which can result in slower performance. For example, for a real-time chat application, using AJAX means continuously checking the server for new messages, which is inefficient in terms of both bandwidth and server resources. That’s where WebSockets come in as a superior alternative. Unlike AJAX, WebSockets offer a two-way communication channel between client and server, as well as push notifications from server to client, bypassing the need for constant polling and resultantly, delivering superior real-time experiences.

Successful Examples of Applying WebSockets

One practical example we can look at to understand this is the use of WebSockets in popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram, which send notifications to millions of users with minimal latency. Google Docs is another prominent example where multiple users can edit a document simultaneously and see immediate updates, thanks to the two-way communication provided by WebSockets. Meanwhile, real-time collaborative tools like Slack and Trello also adopt WebSockets for real-time updates, enabling smooth collaboration. Thus, WebSockets are providing the foundation for a new era of interactive web applications without the limitations faced by traditional AJAX implementations.


Have we truly considered the profound impact that real-time features hold in the fast-paced world of web development? It’s safe to say that both AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML) and WebSockets have revolutionized the way we interact online. Whether it’s instant messaging and live feeds with WebSockets, or dynamic webpage updates using Ajax, both technologies undoubtedly bring about unmatched user engagement. However, as our journey into AJAX and WebSockets reveals, they each serve different purposes and developers must critically examine an application’s needs and requirements before settling for a particular method. By doing so, we can potentially leverage the most out of these technologies, achieving seamless real-time connections that enhance overall user experience.

We encompass a vast wealth of knowledge in our blog that can help you gain a better understanding of how these technologies work and how best to implement them. Track with us as we venture deep into the realm of real-time web technologies. We constantly dive into all aspects of web development, dissecting intricate topics and presenting them in easy-to-grasp, actionable advice. As you journey with us, not only will you stay updated on the latest trends and techniques, but you will also learn how to implement and maximize real-time features for your applications.

In conclusion, it’s important to note that while AJAX provides a means to update parts of a web page without reloading the whole page, hence providing partial page updates, WebSockets go a step further to provide full-duplex communication channels over a single TCP connection. The key is to determine which method best fits your application’s needs. Stick around! We can’t wait to bring you more insights into the riveting world of real-time web development. Our upcoming releases promise engaging and intriguing content that will undeniably give you the upper hand in your development journey. Buckle up and enjoy this enlightening ride!


Q1. What are WebSockets and how do they work?
A1. WebSockets are a communication protocol that allows real-time data exchange between a client and a server. This two-way interaction happens over a single, long-lived connection that gets established the moment a client arrives on a webpage.

Q2. How is AJAX different from WebSockets for real-time features?
A2. AJAX stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML and it’s a set of web technologies used to send and retrieve data from a server asynchronously, without interfering with the display and behavior of the existing page. However, it does not provide a two-way communication channel like WebSockets that can push data from server to client proactively.

Q3. What type of real-time features does WebSocket support?
A3. WebSocket supports features like live feeds, collaboration tools, multi-player games, and real-time analytics. Its persistent connection allows for high-speed, real-time data transfer that enhances user experience.

Q4. Can AJAX and WebSocket be used together?
A4. Yes, AJAX and WebSockets can be used together to create a more robust real-time application. AJAX can be used to handle singular data transactions, while WebSockets can be implemented for continuous data exchange.

Q5. When should I use WebSocket instead of AJAX for real-time features?
A5. WebSocket should be your choice for applications that require high-frequency, low-latency exchanges like online games or live chat. If your application doesn’t require real-time functionality but needs to handle singular data transactions occasionally, AJAX is the better option.